| Money and Markets |
Wednesday, August 30, 2006 |
Dear Subscriber,
Sean’s up in Labrador checking out a uranium company. In
a moment, I’ll show you an e-mail he just sent me from the field. But first, he wanted me to give you an update on an
area that I follow closely: Defense stocks.
My name is John Burke. As the Money and Markets analyst
tasked with tracking global conflicts and the defense industry, I’m constantly reminded how different the world was
twenty years ago when I was serving as an intelligence specialist in the United States Marine Corps.
I trained in mountain and desert warfare in California. I learned
jungle fighting techniques in Panama. I protected U.S. Embassies in Guatemala, Czechoslovakia and Finland. But throughout
it all, the Soviet Union was the foe that got the most attention.
How times change! After the fall of the Soviet Union, the U.S.
was in the ring without an opponent ... until the attacks of September 11 thrust Al-Qaeda and international terrorism into
the spot of public enemy number one.
This doesn’t make me happy. But geopolitical conflicts
and rich defense budgets have been good for defense stocks. Just look at how well the large-cap heavy hitters have been doing
so far this year:
- Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) has soared 33%.
- General Dynamics (NYSE: GD) gained 19%.
- Raytheon (NYSE: RTN) has risen 17%.
Those are the names that everyone knows. Plus there are also
plenty of mid-cap companies that supply these behemoths with products and services. Whichever you choose, the industry’s
fundamentals couldn’t look much better than they do right now …
Demand for U.S.-Made
Defense Products
Soaring
With all that’s going on in the world, a lot of foreign
governments are bulking up their militaries. And guess who they turn to the most when they need the latest equipment: U.S.
companies.
Of course, with some exceptions, they have to ask the Department
of Defense for permission first.
For all of last year, foreign governments proposed $7.2 billion
in purchases. Just through the end of July, they’ve proposed $20 billion! That’s an increase of 177%
and the year is nowhere near over.
|
Foreign Arms Sales Notifications (mil.) |
|
Country |
2005 |
2006 (YTD through July) |
Year-Over-Year Change |
|
Saudi Arabia |
$2,879 |
$9,726 |
237.83% |
|
Pakistan |
$282 |
$5,471 |
1840.07% |
|
Australia |
$1,258 |
$3,000 |
138.47% |
|
Japan |
$491 |
$675 |
37.47% |
|
Bahrain |
$150 |
$294 |
96.00% |
|
Thailand |
$46 |
$246 |
434.78% |
Demand is surging, and the best example is Saudi Arabia. In July,
the Saudis requested to spend up to $9.7 billion on Abrams tanks, Blackhawk and Apache helicopters, and a variety of other
equipment for the modernization of their national guard forces.
Why the shopping spree? Saudi Arabia is worried about Iran’s
growing influence on the Middle East. But they’re not the only ones. Here are a few recent proposed arms sales from
other countries:
Pakistan: $3 billion for 36 F-16 aircraft
and equipment. Primary contractors — BAE Advanced Systems., Boeing Corp., Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman,
Pratt & Whitney, United Technologies Co., General Electric.
United Arab Emirates: $808 million
for 26 UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopters, engines, and equipment. Primary contractors — Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. and General
Electric.
Bahrain: $252 million for 9 UH-60M
Black Hawk helicopters, engines, and equipment. Primary contractors — Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. and General Electric.
I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Of course, demand
from foreign governments is just one part of the picture. Back home …
|
|
|
China reinvesting its huge dollar reserves into its own
economy!
How to hop on this opportunity — and many more —
with the only documented, REAL-WORLD track record that could have turned ...
Each $10,000 into $209,210!
Each $25,000 into $523,025!
Each $50,000 into $1,046,050!*
Click here NOW for details! |
|
|
U.S. National Defense Outlays
Are
Up 82% Since 2000
In 2000, the U.S. spent $294 billion on national defense. This
year, the government will spend an estimated $535 billion. That’s 4.1% of our gross domestic product and nearly 20%
of the total budget.
The most important thing: Spending has not only risen, but should
continue to rise. Since 2003, the average monthly costs for military operations and investment spending
in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the global war on terror have risen substantially.
According to the Congressional Research Service, Iraq costs have
risen 80% to $8 billion while the costs for Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan are up 20% to $1.5 billion.
Bottom line: Defense companies have strong winds behind their
sails.
If you want to get a stake in a bunch of the biggest defense
companies all in one shot, consider a defense-industry ETF like the PowerShares Aerospace & Defense fund (NYSE: PPA).
Or, if you want to learn more about some smaller-cap companies
that I like, check out my report, The Rising Tide of War: Five Defense Stocks Set to Soar.
Meanwhile, the same global tensions that are driving defense
stocks are also pushing up the value of scarce resources and the companies that mine them ... which is why Sean is up in Canada
right now.
Here’s his e-mail.
On the Uranium
Trail in Labrador
Hi Johnny B.,
A helicopter ride is probably old hat to a former Marine like
you, but this was only the second one in my life. Man, those things are fun!
My pilot, Paul, picked me up at the Goose Bay airport. Then we
went to an airbase on the other side of town. It used to host pilots from all over the world, who took advantage of the secluded
location to practice low-flying tactics. But now that it’s easier and cheaper to send drones, the base is eerily quiet,
with some buildings falling into disrepair. It’s a good place to keep a helicopter, though.
We took off and headed northeast. Labrador is mostly wilderness:
Trees, rocks, ponds, lakes, and more trees. From the air, we saw huge scars on the landscape from a forest fire of more than
a decade ago. This place may be wild, but that doesn’t mean it grows back quickly.
There are a bunch of mineral explorers scattered across the province
— gold, copper, nickel, you name it. We passed over a few of their camps along the way. We also flew over traces of
the last uranium boom in Labrador — back in the ’70s, before the price of uranium crashed. I saw roads
to nowhere that are nothing but snowmobile trails today.
After some breathtaking cliffs and saltwater lakes, we finally
ended up at a former fishing village where the company I’m investigating makes its field headquarters. But the actual
mining camp is another helicopter ride away … we’ll be leaving soon.
The air is so crisp and fresh here. I like to remind myself that
this is one reason why uranium is going to get so popular — people don’t like choking on coal dust.
You’re probably wondering about the company I’m here
to investigate. So far, the story is very interesting. They’re sitting on what they estimate to be 40 million pounds
of uranium, but they hope to have an 80-million-pound resource defined by the end of the year.
Shall we do the math? $48 per pound times 80 million pounds is
$3.8 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the stock’s market cap is less than $550 million. That’s right —
you can buy its resources for less than 15 cents on the dollar.
Could something go wrong? Sure. That’s why I’m checking
it out in person. I’ll have the full scoop when I get back.
Until then, you guys take care with that storm coming. If you
have time, would you give my wife a call and see if she needs help with the shutters? Thanks, bud!
See ya later,
Sean
For more information and archived issues, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com
About MONEY AND MARKETS
MONEY AND MARKETS (MaM) is published by Weiss Research, Inc.
and written by Martin D. Weiss along with Sean Brodrick, Larry Edelson, Michael Larson, Nilus Mattive, and Tony Sagami. To
avoid conflicts of interest, Weiss Research and its staff do not hold positions in companies recommended in MaM. Nor do we
accept any compensation for such recommendations. The comments, graphs, forecasts, and indices published in MaM are based
upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates
but must be considered hypothetical inasmuch as we do not track the actual prices investors pay or receive. Regular contributors
and staff include John Burke, Amber Dakar, Monica Lewman-Garcia, Wendy Montes de Oca, Kristen Adams, Jennifer Moran, Red Morgan,
and Julie Trudeau.
Attention editors and publishers! Money and
Markets issues can be republished. Republished issues MUST include attribution of the author(s) and the following short blurb:
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from
Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market,
including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest
rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.MoneyandMarkets.com
From time to time, Money and Markets may have information
from select third-party advertisers known as "external sponsorships." We cannot guarantee the accuracy of these ads. In addition,
these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see
our terms and conditions.
If you have a friend, co-worker or family member who you feel
could benefit from Money & Markets, please forward this issue to a friend.
The information included in this electronic
newsletter is subject to these terms and conditions.
View our Privacy Policy.
Would you like to edit your email notification preferences or unsubscribe from our mailing list?
© 2006 by Weiss Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
15430
Endeavour Drive, Jupiter, FL 33478